The Sand Box

In bringing our children up, I resist the Disney-fication of myth, especially as it relates to the holidays. Halloween seems the most challenging. How do we find right balance? The real content of the feast, the specter of death, is something our culture purposefully avoids? All Hallow’s Eve, the night before the double feasts of All Saint’s Day and All Soul’s Day, the night that goblins and ghouls are released from the cometary, when the un-dead take center stage, the night to face our fears of death.
The hoarding of candy is an example of where the Disney-fication leads the content of every mythologem: consumerism. So how do we prevent that? How do we keep the spooks in? The difference between a Grimm’s fairy tale and a Disney-fied offering is where the answer lies. The working of the oral tale on the imagination in half light around a fire is an important encounter for both children and adults with the archetype of initiation. One of the failings of mass media for our growth and development is that atrophy of our collective imagination in the face of the flood of imagery that assaults our senses. Again, all for the purpose of consumerism. Tonight we will share a tale from a book of fairy tales from North Wales. And yes, the purpose is to feel the fear, to doubt the rational determinism of the limits of reality, to give the irrational a context and opportunity to surface.
Then there is the costuming, the masks, the playing with identity. We take the time to build our costumes and to share to develop a story of the character and role our children will play. My son remembers each and every costume he has built and has made it a point to learn what he wore when he was an infant. These characters map for him his growth. Mask making and wearing is an ancient source of ritual. We encourage our children explore and play with their costumed roles. It needs to be more than asking for candy.
What other values are inherent in the holiday? Behind the sense of the ghouls is simply the seasonal death of autumn. And with that is the celebration of the harvest. We are fortunate to have a pumpkin patch so that the jack-o-lantern we carve we also started from seeds last April, and seeds from these jack-o-lanterns have been saved for next years crop. The extra seeds are baked and the extra pumpkins become pies. In this way the value of sustainability underlies our celebration.
One afterthought: Carl Jung noted that the gods have become our diseases. To that end how interesting to consider the undead quality of the diseases that ravage our society. Consider my challenge to let the ghouls speak again in the light of health care reform. Hmm…now that’s a twist.
AziMuth

I’ve been publishing my dreams as they happen for a few months now. Based on some of the comments I have received here and on Twitter, there are a few point I need to make.
Jung stressed working with the dream series and not just the individual dream, which is why all the charlatans seem like tourists with loud radios at the beach, who never really getting more than their feet wet, never really ever learning to swim in the ocean. The anima, or soul, leads one on an unfolding journey. To explain away any one dream image is to miss the larger patterns that are emerging. In fact, driving too hard into any one image will likely interrupt the flow of the series as a whole. Hence my caution about dream dictionaries and the like. Once an outside source is providing the frame, you are no longer relying on the anima to do that for you. That is not to say that outside sources should not be incorporated into one’s work. It’s matter of perspective and priority. Amplifying a dream image can yield great results and at times the anima seems to suggest that tact.
Another point I need to make. The work unfolding with the dreams presented in this blog do not constitute a Jungian dream analysis. Instead, they present the work of an analysand who would then takes the dreams and the responses into analysis to consult in a deeper and much more personal way the process of individuation, the integration of the complexes, and the subtle calls of the spirit.
Dreams Unfolding
I’m scanning a bookshelf in the Sufi section. A man who is studying with me explains his resistance to keep exploring different subjects as he can always go further into his main interest.
my response:
The dream series makes another swing, here a very different opposite, as if the pattern emerging is a star. From the neolithic ritual focused on survival to the Sufi tradition which is in my view the most aesthetically developed of the spiritual paths. Even when considering the intellectual rigor of Ibn Arabi, there is an aesthetic formalism that emerges.
What is interesting is that the man articulates my own inner resistance to potentially needing to study cultures and traditions that I have no frame of reference for as yet, for instance if the course of study over the next five years requires Polynesian mythology. The path I am entering on may demand the heavy lifting of developing yet further frames of reference, yet I experience the further need to work within the frames I’ve already read into. In the end, the root fear is that the content will not ‘light up’, I’ll not catch hold of the unique spiritual expression. As long as the content glows like coals, there really is no heavy lifting to be done. Olson claimed if you read you way through any subject completely, everything else opens itself to you. I know this to be true, but sense the dream series is questioning faith in these dreams, do I believe it to be so? Do I believe that the inner spiritual needs will find their fulfillment if I follow paths that I have not chosen. Control can be such a hang up.