Firing Intention

by Richard Reeve on November 13, 2008

in AziMuth

Book illustration, pen drawing

AziMuth

The most valuable unpublished work I’ve ever come across was a short essay by the poet Charles Olson titled “Notes on Reading Frobenius.”  I was honored to receive permission to publish it about eight years ago in a small literary zine I had created, also titled AziMuth.  It was an honor because the accomplishment of the publication relied on the insights within the essay.  The whole premise using the analogy of an African hunting ritual: “To put one in shape for action.”

One draws a ‘picture’ on a bare spot on the ground, 4 palms size.  Just as the sun rises you fire an arrow into the picture.  After you have then duplicated the success in the hunt you come back and put hairs of the animal [you took away some grass or tuft to make the spot bare] and some of its blood onto the drawing.  Having done this as carefully as you did the preparation you then rub it all away.  And then you are free to go eat the animal or anything else, to go about your business until another time when you may, and there isn’t any question that you will, have to do like again in order to do anything as meaningful at all.

There is one catch that Olson makes clear: the importance of not explaining what you are doing. He continues,

“There isn’t but this one way, and with each of its exact steps included [and taken, including not mentioning that that is what you are doing.  That is you can say anything which is itself part of doing whatever is sought to be done, but above all & never dare you let that become a knowledge other than its own written evidence, itself as an ability.  Or you loose then..."

The danger of talking 'about' for any 'action': it is how energy gets diverted, siphoned away, depleted.  To talk about is to talk around; action, the firing of energy, the release of self into the intended image.  Much of the ritual in our lives is directed toward collective spiritual ends, far removed from individual action.  Does this serve us?

(image cc via Wikipedia)


Blog Widget by LinkWithin

  • "You can say what ever is part of what is sought to be done."
    It's a creative dilemma, and one I've experienced. In all the enthusiam of a new vision, I've spent all the energy load that comes with the vision shouting from the mountain ""I've got a vision, I've got a vision" onyl to find down the road, that spilling of the contents led to the vision being lost. Olson was a writer and totally embraced the telling. He was a prolific letter writer, totally embracing the exchange. I think he would have embraced a media like twitter as well.
  • like others will need to re-read to truly understand this. But often I've explained an intent to others and then for some reason its not happened and I feel shamefaced. Its sometimes as if talking about it 'hexes' it somehow, dilutes the energy towards creating the happening? I don't know.. Or of course in telling before hand it allows others to disuade or influence so therefore its not truly your own idea. Perhaps that's why the ritual needs to be a solitary and personal one. How would the energy differ if a group of hunters made the shape together?

    . I agree that sometimes its better to get on with it and tell it afterwards - although where does that leave the likes of Twitter or blogs?

    Julie
    x
  • Hey Jeb,
    Olson's point gets at the creative dilemma of being "put in shape for action." The essay is is focused on that third of the pragmatic triad thought/belief/action. Note : you can say that which is part of the action...so if part of the action is building consensus, then so be it. What he's getting at is the amount of energy that can get wasted trying to convince others (and his point would boomerang back to trying to convince ourselves) of our vision. That which is about goes around with out grabbing hold of the thing...
    Working backwards: the personal ritual makes the higher self the witness to the vision, and the point would be that is the only audience needed if our 'belief' is solid. All the attempts at sorting things out, the convincing is the wrestling that occurs with 'thought' trying to find it's certainty. So thought/belief/action...the above all about action. I can shoot you a copy of the entire essay. Olson is dense, a poet's poet, but the gems to be found will not disappoint.

    Jesse,
    I've been working out of a posture from the Celtic Myths lately, where Queen Mauve tests the future King's. She will grant the three deepest desires of their heart, but only if they can speak them in the next breath they take. Living in a manner where our intention is always prepared to speak that answer has been most fruitful for my practice, in fact, it's changed my life in considerable ways. It took me a few months to polish my intent, but I got there...
  • Love this! It's about intention and action. I often ask myself why I don't accomplish certain outcomes and that answer is usually "because I never had that outcome as an intention."

    Also love the ritual of visualization. Much easier and more effective than doing a 15 page business plan!
  • jeb
    richard, am i interpreting the above correctly by taking this away - that our success in any endeavor is lessened (the likelihood for it, that is) if we first tell the world (or some person in it) what we are about to do?

    is this because the action, then, becomes less about doing what needs to be done and more about trying to get other people's approval/admiration/envy because of the action we're considering?
blog comments powered by Disqus