
- Image via Wikipedia
One of Jung’s guiding principals when attempting to understand how the unconscious functions in relationship to our conscious attitudes is this: he teaches that the unconscious acts in a compensatory manner. Say what?
For me a useful image is that of a sailor leaning way out over the side of the boat to keep it on course in a strong wind, but perhaps with the inverse relationship. The dreams are like a huge cinema images projected on the sail attempting to compensate or pull the conscious attitude of the sailor to align with the goals of the objective psyche.
Once we understand this aspect of balance, we can approach dream images in a manner that does not always jump to the literal interpretation but instead asks where is this image pulling me, how does it redirect my current understanding. This opens the aspect of dialogue which is fundamental to the transcendent function (that was discussed here).
That being said, sometimes the unconscious does speak directly. So how does one know the difference? Practice, practice, practice…How do know the difference when a friend is dead serious or simply talking in hyperbole? My sense is that your knowledge of the person based on your relationship guides your understanding. The subtlety of the “art” is similar.

I'm a Lame Duck with Search
Need a little help...
Are you a torque amplifier?