Junk

by Richard Reeve on March 15, 2009

in @CCSeed

Space Junk
Image by Andrew Coulter Enright via Flickr

In many ways the news cycle has slowed down.

This past week Bernie Maydoff was sent to prison for what will likely be the rest of his life for the largest Ponzi scheme in history.  As my good friend Doug has noted “leveraging down is hell…”  What’s so interesting is his smoke and mirrors game was going on for decades.

Let’s not miss this story, that fraud and abuse could be responsible for for a substantial percent of the increases in medicare.

NASA had to rush the crew of the Space Station into the escape pod while a wayward piece of our space garbage spiraled by dangerously close. Audio here.  Again, the problem of our space junk has been mounting for…decades.

So today’s end note, thinking of the news from an archetypal perspective, is simple: while its often the case that current events often present the face of a scary dragon, the body of the beast extends back in time decades, and if we can really open our eyes, centuries.  What collective attitude would make it acceptable to act in such a way to litter our inner space orbiting zone with 100000 pieces of space junk.  Granted, much of it is due to accidents, but not all of it.  I’d point out that our sense that we dump what ever is not useful and run to the next thing, collectively, like a child that does not know how to put his or her toys away after playing.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • Doug
    I believe I am the "Doug of Doom" of the leveraging down comment.

    A negative perspective on space debris is that sooner or later a "critical mass" of debris will occur. Much as an atom bomb explodes because each neutron splitting an atomic nucleus releases more than one new neutron to split another nucleus, eventually each space satellite collision will release enough debris to collide with on average more than one other satellite. When that "critical mass" occurs, all satellites will disappear in what will probably be a sort of slow motion mass exit. No more space stations, no more spy satellites, no more weather satellites, no more communications satellites. While it is easy to conceptualize this eventual certainty, it is difficult to quantify mathematically when or how it will happen. Are we close to that day, or is it still far off?

    By the way, Medicare starts for me on April 1.
  • Fascinating image you render here Doug. Is it inevitable? It would be an interesting tactics of space warfare to simply wipe out the zone with debris as well if we are going to render fully what might speed up the process.
  • Another interpretation...the 'junk' we hold onto from our past affects our now, and our 'to be'. I sense, though, that perhaps we can clean this type of junk up. It's a hard business, but it's possible...and I guess that's why those that can pull it off are rewarded so abundantly.

    Anybody see a dumpster around? I've been stockpiling a bit too long. :)

    <abbr>Jeb Dickerson´s last blog post..The formative years</abbr>
  • Interesting take Jeb. In some ways it's built into the behavior of the species. It's always the junk piles that provide the intrigue the archeology of homo sapiens. The question I have is: does it have to be that way? How long can we afford to just toss our junk?
  • Hey Henie...sorry for being obtuse. The space junk is really just our litter from satellites and rockets. The point is that it has been acceptable to leave it there. Now its a problem because its threatening the space station. So the point I'm getting at is how our short sightedness creates our problems...ie. making the quick buck...
  • Richard,

    I'm not clear on what you are saying but I will bravely venture to say that eventually when the earth combusts, would it not then be added "space debris?" Who's to really say how "debris" might evolve or would it?

    Thanks for expanding my curiosity to learn! :~)

    <abbr>Henie´s last blog post..Double You But One</abbr>
blog comments powered by Disqus