Feeling Palettes

by Richard Reeve on April 4, 2009

in AziMuth

colour palette
Image by Ei! Kumpel via Flickr

I’ve been exploring feeling palettes for a few weeks on twitter and thought I might give a broader explanation of what I’m doing with these three words experiments.

In Jungian typology each person has a highly developed function (thinking, feeling, sensation or intuition).  It is their strength and the function they most interact in the world with.  On the wheel of these functions, thinking and feeling form one axis, while sensation and intuition form the other axis.  The main function is balanced by the inferior function at the other end of it’s axis.  The two functions that form the other axis act as secondary functions.

Jung taught that feeling is not simply the emotions, but that ability of the ego that grasps and orders the world of values.  Feelings are the ego’s participation in the instinctual emotive responses.  It sees tonally, like music and color, and it is intimately tied to our ability to discern moral realities.  It is one thing to think of an unjust scenario and another to feel an injustice.

I’m intuitive.  I engage the world primarily seeing the possibilities.

Thinking and feeling are both functions that can grow or strengthen in my personality.  To aid my grasp of the feeling function I’ve been attempting a few times a day to render my feeling state in three words.  I keep a list of nearly a thousand words handy to aid the process.

Most recently…

Feeling palette: delighted, sharp, inventive

So, what have you been feeling?

Related Posts:

Crash Course in the types of consciousness

Finding the divide between feeling and emotion

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • creative, contemplative, peaceful

    I'm so glad I found this site!

    <abbr>Cheryl Chow´s last blog post..Two Mindsets—and Our Paths Diverged</abbr>
  • Creative, intrigued and warm...

    In relation to naming the feeling palette, I'm also wondering whether, by using words to name the feelings, we're actually travelling across the spectrum and exercising our thinking function? In other words, we're thinking about feeling?

    One of the times when I'm very aware of the distinction between the thinking and feeling functions is when my partner, Chris, and I are co-presenting. Frequently, when we talk afterwards about a session, Chris mentions something I'd said or done - a response I'd had at a particular moment in time - that he'd noticed and had assumed was my response to something I'd observed about the group.

    In my reality however, I'd not been consciously aware of observing anything in the group. So my response had been (I assume) the result of exercising my predominant feeling and intuitive functions. Whereas Chris (again I'm assuming here) had been drawing conclusions and making meaning out of the experience through predominant sensing and thinking functions.

    Thank you for prompting me to reflect on this! :-)

    <abbr>Sue James´s last blog post..On Time and Tesseracts</abbr>
  • Happy, Creative, Excited!

    <abbr>Henie´s last blog post..Life Is Like A Door</abbr>
  • satisfied
    warm
    focused

    <abbr>judy´s last blog post..Toilet paper tube art?</abbr>
  • Zoe
    Exhilarated, expressive, reflective.

    <abbr>Zoe´s last blog post..Mind Mapping Your Blog (or Project)</abbr>
  • Creative, honest, confident.
blog comments powered by Disqus